School Community

Related to our discussion the other day over whether public dollars should fund degrees that dont lead to jobs: The U.S. Department of Education will now impose a gainful employment rule, which will ban for-profit schools from federal financial aid if a sizable number of their graduates cant find jobs that that enable them to repay their student loans.

While students at for-profit institutions represent 12 percent of all higher education students, they represent 26 percent of all student loans and 46 percent of all student loan dollars in default. The median Federal student loan debt carried by students earning associate degrees at for-profit institutions was $14,000, while the majority of students at community colleges do not borrow for the same degrees.

The for-profits live on public dollars as more than a quarter receive 80 percent of their revenues from taxpayer-financed federal student aid. Given their reliance on federal aid, this would seem to be a spur for reform within their ranks.

The new rules do not go far enough, according to José Cruz, vice president of the Education Trust. In a statement, Cruz said:

The abuses of career colleges have been well documented. But the final, watered-down rule does not do nearly enough to curb these abuses. It provides students and taxpayers with only the most meager of protections against an aggressive industry bent on exponential growth and ever-escalating profits. In the end, the 436-page document is little more than an a la carte menu of ways these institutions can game the system.

For example, under the new regulations, many of the most toxic career education programs will continue to operate — largely at taxpayer expense — for three years with no requirements to improve. And because 81 percent of these programs are two years or fewer, the vast majority of students will be out of school and into the job market, shouldering huge debt and holding a certificate or diploma that may or may not lead to gainful employment before any sanctions are levied against the programs that shortchanged their dreams and made off with their cash.

In announcing the regulations, Secretary Arne Duncan told The New York Times that “as a country, we need this sector to succeed.” This is a troubling statement, but makes clear the point of view the administration took in finalizing these regulations. America does not need this sector to succeed. We need our students to succeed. Regulation designed for the success of the sector won’t help our students, our economy or our democracy.

According to US DOE:

Today, the Obama Administration released final regulations requiring career college programs to better prepare students for gainful employment or risk losing access to Federal student aid. While many career college programs are helping to prepare America’s workforce for the jobs of the future, far too many students at these schools are taking on unsustainable debt in exchange for degrees and certificates that fail to help them get the jobs they need or were promised. These regulations are designed to ramp up over the next four years, giving colleges time to reform while protecting students and their families from exploitative programs.

“These new regulations will help ensure that students at these schools are getting what they pay for: solid preparation for a good job,” Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said. “Were giving career colleges every opportunity to reform themselves but were not letting them off the hook, because too many vulnerable students are being hurt,” Duncan continued.

To qualify for Federal aid, the law requires that most for-profit programs and certificate programs at nonprofit and public institutions prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. Under the regulations introduced today, a program would be considered to lead to gainful employment if it meets at least one of the following three metrics: at least 35 percent of former students are repaying their loans (defined as reducing the loan balance by at least $1); the estimated annual loan payment of a typical graduate does not exceed 30 percent of his or her discretionary income; or the estimated annual loan payment of a typical graduate does not exceed 12 percent of his or her total earnings. While the regulations apply to occupational training programs at all types of institutions, for-profit programs are most likely to leave their students with unaffordable debts and poor employment prospects.

While for-profit schools have profited and prospered thanks to Federal dollars, some of their students have not. This is a disservice to students and taxpayers, and undermines the valuable work being done by the for-profit education industry as a whole, Duncan continued.

Efforts to regulate abuse by for-profit institutions date back to the Reagan administration, under the leadership of then Secretary of Education William Bennett. However, regulations were weakened during the previous administration, leading to the rapid growth of enrollment and default rates at for-profit institutions seen in recent years.

These problems and wide-spread evidence of waste, fraud and abuse prompted the Obama administration to embark on an 18-month negotiation with the higher education community over new regulations. During the negotiation, the Department worked with stakeholders to develop a set of proposals around 14 specific issues that strengthen the integrity of the Federal student aid program and ensure that taxpayer funds are used appropriately. The final gainful employment regulations published today follow that two-year process and will go into effect on July 1, 2012.

Based on thoughtful consideration of public comments and concerns, the new regulations improve upon the Department’s previously released draft proposal. The rules issued today, which reflect the principles outlined in the President’s recent Executive Order on improving regulations, provide students and consumers with the information they need to make good educational choices and give failing programs ample opportunity to make needed improvements. Institutions will now be required to disclose their total program costs, loan repayment rates, graduates’ debt-to-earnings ratio and other critical consumer information to help students better choose the gainful employment program that’s right for them. And poor performing programs must fail the debt measures three times in a four-year period before losing eligibility to participate in Federal student aid programs, rather than losing eligibility immediately.

The first time a program fails to meet the debt measure it must disclose to students why the measurement was missed and how the issue will be addressed. After missing the debt measure for the second time in four years, programs must inform students that their debts may be unaffordable after graduation, that the program is at risk of losing eligibility to participate in Federal student aid programs, and what their existing transfer options are. After a third failure in four years, the program loses eligibility to participate in Federal student aid programs and cannot reapply for eligibility for at least three years. Under this framework, the first year a program could become ineligible would be 2015, based on its performance in FY 2012-2014.

“We’re asking companies that get up to 90 percent of their profits from taxpayer dollars to be at least 35 percent effective,” Duncan said. “This is a perfectly reasonable bar and one that every for-profit program should be able to reach. We’re also giving poor performing for-profit programs every chance to improve. But if you get three strikes in four years, you’re out.

Similar Posts:

• Obama Unveils New Student Loan Rules
• For Profit Colleges Have Highest 2 Year College Graduation Rate
• Jan 4, Online non profit management masters | Masters degree in non profit management
• U.S. Proposes New Education Privacy Rules
• Alabama State called out by feds for steep college tuition hike; 43-percent jump