BBC to remember the cost of news in human lives
Written by Mitchell Steiner on April 27, 2011 – 3:11 pmJournalists are by reputation busy people. Hard-bitten, cynical even. But in times like these it’s obvious how much everybody owes to their courage and skill, working in war zones like Libya, and in dangerous places – especially for journalists - from Mexico to Russia.
Next Tuesday, May 3, is World Press Freedom Day. The recent deaths in Libya of the photojournalists Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros, killed in a mortar attack on the city of Misrata, will still be fresh in people’s memories.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of events are being held across the world to mark World Press Freedom Day – when the United Nations asks everyone to stop and think about the cost of journalism in human lives. I detect a keener awareness than ever of the debt owed to journalists.
This year, Peter Horrocks, Director of BBC Global News, is calling for a minute’s silence at 11 am to mark the sacrifices made by journalists in the name of press freedom, and to honour those who have been killed. So on the first working day after the long holiday break, BBC journalists will be asked to stop work briefly to show their respect.
The BBC joins Reuters, the world’s leading news agency, in giving public recognition in this very visible way to the sacrifice, including the risk of injury or death, involved in finding out and reporting the news.
Some might see this as just a gesture, which will surely not be observed by all. But the turmoil, anguish and the death toll from the Arab Spring revolts and revolutions have brought home as rarely before how critical the role of journalists is, in not just doing a job, but reporting on events which decide the fate of nations.
The leading United Nations agency for defending the freedom of the press and freedom of expression worldwide is UNESCO. It is now taking the lead in a serious attempt to win the agreement of governments for better, stronger safeguards for journalists - not as a privilege but because their work can often put them in the front line of danger, and because that work is vital to help people make key choices based on reliable information rather than propaganda.
On Tuesday, many of the biggest names in British media, including the Financial Times, the Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail and Sky News, are actively supporting a public event at the Thomson-Reuters’ London headquarters: a discussion, Arab Spring 2011: The freedom to report, with leading journalists from the North Africa and Middle East as well as the UK.
It will be a chance to remember that the struggle for free media and free expression, and against censorship and lies, can be as decisive as battles fought with guns.
Similar Posts:
- News is more than just eyewitness and a mobile pic
- University of Alabama at Birmingham professor to be president of American Heart Association
- UK media blind with indignation at Strasbourg court
- Hyperlocal breaking news: Whose role is it anyway?
- Mark Tully: Too much detail for London; too simplistic for India
Posted in University Articles | No Comments »
